Thomas Ackermann writes:
>> If I were to decide today to change the spellings, with an explicit
>> purpose of making things more consistent across documentation, it
>> may make sense to use even a simpler rule that is less error-prone
>> for people who write new sentences that has to have the wor
>
> If I were to decide today to change the spellings, with an explicit
> purpose of making things more consistent across documentation, it
> may make sense to use even a simpler rule that is less error-prone
> for people who write new sentences that has to have the word. How
> about treating it
"Joachim Schmitz" writes:
> Because then it could get confused with "git", the command? That would
> be lower case even at the beginning of a sentence, wouldn't it?
Is it a real-world problem?
I think in a prose when you refer to "git" the command, you would
say something like
The `git
Junio C Hamano wrote:
David Aguilar writes:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Thomas Ackermann
wrote:
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ History Viewers
- *gitweb* (shipped with git-core)
- GITweb provides full-fledged web interface for GIT repositories.
+ GITweb provides full-fledged web interface
David Aguilar writes:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Thomas Ackermann wrote:
>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ History Viewers
>>
>> - *gitweb* (shipped with git-core)
>>
>> - GITweb provides full-fledged web interface for GIT repositories.
>> + GITweb provides full-fledged web interface for Git
Thomas Ackermann writes:
> The whole point of my patch is to use 'Git' consistently when
> we are talking about the system and not the individual command.
I like the idea. "git" should obviously remain lower-case when talking
about the command, but deserves a capital when talking about the
soft
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Thomas Ackermann wrote:
>
>>
>> What about GITweb?
>>
> You are right; I missed that because I grepped only for 'GIT' as a whole word.
> 'gitweb' and 'GITweb' should be changed to 'Gitweb'.
>
>>
>> IMO some of these look nicer when everything is lowercase.
>> e.g.
>
> What about GITweb?
>
You are right; I missed that because I grepped only for 'GIT' as a whole word.
'gitweb' and 'GITweb' should be changed to 'Gitweb'.
>
> IMO some of these look nicer when everything is lowercase.
> e.g. "standard git committer ident format".
>
IMHO what seems nicer he
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ History Viewers
>
> - *gitweb* (shipped with git-core)
>
> - GITweb provides full-fledged web interface for GIT repositories.
> + GITweb provides full-fledged web interface for Git repositories.
What about GITweb
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann
---
Documentation/asciidoc.conf | 2 +-
Documentation/everyday.txt | 4 ++--
Documentation/git-clone.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/git-cvsexportcommit.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/
10 matches
Mail list logo