On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:37:18PM +0100, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > But in (b), we use the number of stored objects, _not_ the allocated
> > size of the objects array. So we can run into a situation like this:
> >
> > 1. packlist_alloc() needs to store the Nth object, so it grows the
> >
Jeff King writes:
> But in (b), we use the number of stored objects, _not_ the allocated
> size of the objects array. So we can run into a situation like this:
>
> 1. packlist_alloc() needs to store the Nth object, so it grows the
> objects array to M, where M > N.
>
> 2.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:04 AM Jeff King wrote:
>
> Commit 108f530385 (pack-objects: move tree_depth into 'struct
> packing_data', 2018-08-16) dynamically manages a tree_depth array in
> packing_data that maintains one of these invariants:
>
> 1. tree_depth is NULL (i.e., the requested
Commit 108f530385 (pack-objects: move tree_depth into 'struct
packing_data', 2018-08-16) dynamically manages a tree_depth array in
packing_data that maintains one of these invariants:
1. tree_depth is NULL (i.e., the requested options don't require us to
track tree depths)
2. tree_depth
4 matches
Mail list logo
