Joel Teichroeb writes:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> Are you documenting an existing breakage? Are you extending test
>> coverage for some breakage we recently fixed without adding tests to
>> ensure that the fix will stay unbroken? Are you planning to touch
>>
Hi Junio,
I was just too lazy to write a cover letter, and thought these would
make sense on their own. I'll make sure to include a cover letter next
time.
I just ripped them out of my patch series on implementing stash as a
builtin[1]. Since I haven't had time, I figured I could at least get
the
I see three patches that add tests, but it is hard to judge them
without any explanation on what the point of them are.
Are you documenting an existing breakage? Are you extending test
coverage for some breakage we recently fixed without adding tests to
ensure that the fix will stay unbroken? Ar
Ensure the command suceeds and outputs nothing
Signed-off-by: Joel Teichroeb
---
t/t3903-stash.sh | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t3903-stash.sh b/t/t3903-stash.sh
index 4046817d70..f0708ced27 100755
--- a/t/t3903-stash.sh
+++ b/t/t3903-stash.sh
@@ -444,6 +444,14 @@
4 matches
Mail list logo