Re: [PATCH 1/3] t6010: test actual test output

2017-09-15 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:01:27PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 14.09.2017 16:34: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > >> 4f21454b55 ("merge-base: handle --fork-point without reflog", > >> 2016-10-12) introduced a fix for

Re: [PATCH 1/3] t6010: test actual test output

2017-09-15 Thread Michael J Gruber
Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 14.09.2017 16:34: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> 4f21454b55 ("merge-base: handle --fork-point without reflog", >> 2016-10-12) introduced a fix for merge-base --fork-point without reflog >> and a test. While that test is fine,

Re: [PATCH 1/3] t6010: test actual test output

2017-09-14 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > 4f21454b55 ("merge-base: handle --fork-point without reflog", > 2016-10-12) introduced a fix for merge-base --fork-point without reflog > and a test. While that test is fine, it did not update expected nor actual > output and

[PATCH 1/3] t6010: test actual test output

2017-09-14 Thread Michael J Gruber
4f21454b55 ("merge-base: handle --fork-point without reflog", 2016-10-12) introduced a fix for merge-base --fork-point without reflog and a test. While that test is fine, it did not update expected nor actual output and tested that of the previous test instead. Fix the test to test the merge-base