Re: [PATCH 1/6] submodule foreach: correct path display in recursive submodules

Stefan Beller writes: > The new test replicates the previous test with the difference of executing > from a sub directory. By executing from a sub directory all we would > expect all displayed paths to be prefixed by '../'. -ECANTPARSE on the last sentence. Remove the first

[PATCH 1/6] submodule foreach: correct path display in recursive submodules

The new test replicates the previous test with the difference of executing from a sub directory. By executing from a sub directory all we would expect all displayed paths to be prefixed by '../'. Prior to this patch the test would report Entering 'nested1/nested2/../nested3' instead of the

[PATCH 1/6] submodule foreach: correct path display in recursive submodules

The new test replicates the previous test with the difference of executing from a sub directory. By executing from a sub directory all we would expect all displayed paths to be prefixed by '../'. Prior to this patch the test would report Entering 'nested1/nested2/../nested3' instead of the