When we try to read from a remote-helper and get EOF or an
error, we print a message indicating that the helper died.
However, users may not know that a remote helper was in use
(e.g., when using git-over-http), or even what a remote
helper is.
Let's print the name of the helper (e.g.,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
When we try to read from a remote-helper and get EOF or an
error, we print a message indicating that the helper died.
However, users may not know that a remote helper was in use
(e.g., when using git-over-http), or even what a
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:23:56PM -0700, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
When we try to read from a remote-helper and get EOF or an
error, we print a message indicating that the helper died.
However, users may not know that a remote
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Now that's the kind of whole-hearted endorsement I strive for. :)
It's nothing wrong with your patch, the main problem is that there's
not really a good place to point users at.
If you have better wording, I'm open to it. I do
4 matches
Mail list logo