On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
The goal of this series being rewriting `git submodule update`,
we don't want to call out to the shell script for config lookups.
So reimplement
Am 05.08.2015 um 02:04 schrieb Stefan Beller:
The goal of this series being rewriting `git submodule update`,
we don't want to call out to the shell script for config lookups.
So reimplement the lookup of the submodule name in C.
Cool. This brings down the duration of the test suite from 3:13
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de wrote:
Am 05.08.2015 um 02:04 schrieb Stefan Beller:
The goal of this series being rewriting `git submodule update`,
we don't want to call out to the shell script for config lookups.
So reimplement the lookup of the submodule
The series consists of 2 patches only actually. The next patches have
not been sent as they are heavy WIP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
The goal of this series being rewriting `git submodule update`,
we don't want to call out to the shell script for config lookups.
So reimplement the lookup of the submodule name in C.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
---
When I started to implement git submodule add in the
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
The goal of this series being rewriting `git submodule update`,
we don't want to call out to the shell script for config lookups.
So reimplement the lookup of the submodule name in C.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
6 matches
Mail list logo
