Re: [PATCH 2/6] submodule update --init: correct path handling in recursive submodules

2016-03-29 Thread Stefan Beller
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> The new test demonstrates a failure in the code prior to this patch. >> Instead of getting the expected >> Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path >> '../super/submodule' >> the `super` d

Re: [PATCH 2/6] submodule update --init: correct path handling in recursive submodules

2016-03-29 Thread Junio C Hamano
Stefan Beller writes: > The new test demonstrates a failure in the code prior to this patch. > Instead of getting the expected > Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path > '../super/submodule' > the `super` directory is omitted and you get > Submodule 'submodule' (${p

[PATCH 2/6] submodule update --init: correct path handling in recursive submodules

2016-03-29 Thread Stefan Beller
The new test demonstrates a failure in the code prior to this patch. Instead of getting the expected Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path '../super/submodule' the `super` directory is omitted and you get Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path '

[PATCH 2/6] submodule update --init: correct path handling in recursive submodules

2016-03-29 Thread Stefan Beller
The new test demonstrates a failure in the code prior to this patch. Instead of getting the expected Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path '../super/submodule' the `super` directory is omitted and you get Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path '