On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> The new test demonstrates a failure in the code prior to this patch.
>> Instead of getting the expected
>> Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path
>> '../super/submodule'
>> the `super` d
Stefan Beller writes:
> The new test demonstrates a failure in the code prior to this patch.
> Instead of getting the expected
> Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path
> '../super/submodule'
> the `super` directory is omitted and you get
> Submodule 'submodule' (${p
The new test demonstrates a failure in the code prior to this patch.
Instead of getting the expected
Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path
'../super/submodule'
the `super` directory is omitted and you get
Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path '
The new test demonstrates a failure in the code prior to this patch.
Instead of getting the expected
Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path
'../super/submodule'
the `super` directory is omitted and you get
Submodule 'submodule' (${pwd}/submodule) registered for path '
4 matches
Mail list logo