Re: [PATCH 2/7] t7900: Start testing usability of namespaced remote refs

2013-05-07 Thread Johan Herland
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes: +test_expect_success 'work-around clone with namespaced remote refs' ' + rm -rf client + git init client + ( + cd client + git remote add

Re: [PATCH 2/7] t7900: Start testing usability of namespaced remote refs

2013-05-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes: That said, I could have a go at using refs/peers/* instead of refs/remotes/*, and see how that works out. Hmm, I had refs/track/ in mind. Perhaps peers may work as well. If it sticks, how pervasive do we want this renaming to be? I guess we don't

Re: [PATCH 2/7] t7900: Start testing usability of namespaced remote refs

2013-05-06 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes: +test_expect_success 'work-around clone with namespaced remote refs' ' + rm -rf client + git init client + ( + cd client + git remote add origin ../server + git config --unset-all

[PATCH 2/7] t7900: Start testing usability of namespaced remote refs

2013-05-04 Thread Johan Herland
Some users are interested in fetching remote refs into a separate namespace in the local repo. E.g. instead of the usual remote config: [remote origin] fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* url = ... they want to keep remote tags separate from local tags, and they may