On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:35 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > Eric Sunshine writes:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:37 AM SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> >>> The change below should be squashed into this patch to fix a
> >>> previously unnoticed broken &&-chain. I think you
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:50 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
> > The exact reason is that the prerequisite was not met (indeed, I
> > wasn't even aware of that prerequisite), so the commit message can be
> > more direct:
> >
> > This was missed by the previous clean-ups due
Eric Sunshine writes:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:35 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Junio C Hamano writes:
>> Oops, sent before completing the message.
>>
>> For that to happen, we need a sign-off ;-)
>>
>> I guess this one would have been caught with the "sed script on
>> subshell"
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:35 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
> Oops, sent before completing the message.
>
> For that to happen, we need a sign-off ;-)
>
> I guess this one would have been caught with the "sed script on
> subshell" linter that does not execute?
Yes,
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:37 AM SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>>> The change below should be squashed into this patch to fix a
>>> previously unnoticed broken &&-chain. I think you missed it, because
>>> this test script is rather expensive and you
Eric Sunshine writes:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:37 AM SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>> The change below should be squashed into this patch to fix a
>> previously unnoticed broken &&-chain. I think you missed it, because
>> this test script is rather expensive and you didn't run it with
>>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:44:49PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:37 AM SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> > The change below should be squashed into this patch to fix a
> > previously unnoticed broken &&-chain. I think you missed it, because
> > this test script is rather expensive
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:37 AM SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> The change below should be squashed into this patch to fix a
> previously unnoticed broken &&-chain. I think you missed it, because
> this test script is rather expensive and you didn't run it with
> GIT_TEST_CLONE_2GB=YesPlease.
>
> diff
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine
> ---
> t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 2 +-
> t/t5302-pack-index.sh | 2 +-
> t/t5401-update-hooks.sh| 4 ++--
> t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh | 2 +-
> t/t5505-remote.sh | 2 +-
> t/t5512-ls-remote.sh | 4 ++--
>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine
---
t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 2 +-
t/t5302-pack-index.sh | 2 +-
t/t5401-update-hooks.sh| 4 ++--
t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh | 2 +-
t/t5505-remote.sh | 2 +-
t/t5512-ls-remote.sh | 4 ++--
10 matches
Mail list logo