Hi Hannes,
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 26.04.2017 um 22:21 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> > We free()d the `log` buffer when dwim_log() returned 1, but not when it
> > returned a larger value (which meant that it still allocated the buffer
> > but we simply ignored it).
> >
>
Am 26.04.2017 um 22:21 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
We free()d the `log` buffer when dwim_log() returned 1, but not when it
returned a larger value (which meant that it still allocated the buffer
but we simply ignored it).
Identified by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
We free()d the `log` buffer when dwim_log() returned 1, but not when it
returned a larger value (which meant that it still allocated the buffer
but we simply ignored it).
Identified by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
reflog-walk.c | 6 +-
1 file
3 matches
Mail list logo