David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com writes:
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
In the ideal world, I think whoever tries to compare two cache-trees
(i.e. test-dump-cache-tree) should *not* care, because we are merely
trying to show what the correct tree object name
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:31 PM, David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com wrote:
Add tests to confirm that invalidation of subdirectories neither over-
nor under-invalidates.
Signed-off-by: David Turner dtur...@twitter.com
---
t/t0090-cache-tree.sh | 26 +++---
1 file
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:31 PM, David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com
wrote:
Add tests to confirm that invalidation of subdirectories neither over-
nor under-invalidates.
Signed-off-by: David Turner dtur...@twitter.com
---
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
+ sed -n -e s/[0-9]* subtrees// -e '/#(ref)/d' -e '/^invalid /p'
actual
Is the second one to remove #(ref), which appears for a good
reference cache tree entry shown for comparison, necessary? Do
they ever begin with invalid? If they ever
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
+ sed -n -e s/[0-9]* subtrees// -e '/#(ref)/d' -e '/^invalid /p'
actual
Is the second one to remove #(ref), which appears for a good
reference cache tree entry shown for
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:27 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:31 PM, David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com
wrote:
Add tests to confirm that invalidation of subdirectories neither over-
nor under-invalidates.
Add tests to confirm that invalidation of subdirectories neither over-
nor under-invalidates.
Signed-off-by: David Turner dtur...@twitter.com
---
t/t0090-cache-tree.sh | 26 +++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
7 matches
Mail list logo