Re: [PATCH 3/5] rebase: fix sequence continuation

2013-05-28 Thread Felipe Contreras
Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > > > We are not in am mode. > > That may make sense, but shouldn't this part be like so from the > very beginning? In other words, this looks like an "oops, 1/5 was > buggy and this is a hotfix". How can 1/5 be introducing a bug? It's merely sp

Re: [PATCH 3/5] rebase: fix sequence continuation

2013-05-28 Thread Junio C Hamano
Felipe Contreras writes: > We are not in am mode. That may make sense, but shouldn't this part be like so from the very beginning? In other words, this looks like an "oops, 1/5 was buggy and this is a hotfix". > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras > --- > git-rebase--cherry.sh | 10 ++

[PATCH 3/5] rebase: fix sequence continuation

2013-05-28 Thread Felipe Contreras
We are not in am mode. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- git-rebase--cherry.sh | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/git-rebase--cherry.sh b/git-rebase--cherry.sh index ab1f8b7..ca78b1b 100644 --- a/git-rebase--cherry.sh +++ b/git-rebase--cherry.sh @@ -