Jeff King writes:
>> to have *some* names there, for the sake of a
>> simply described coding style without many exceptions
>> (especially those exceptions that rely on judgement).
>
> Fair enough.
For the record, there aren't "many" exceptions to the rule that was
suggested earlier: if you refe
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:50:05PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Can be used as a no-op hunk_fn for xdi_diff_outf(), since a NULL
> > + * one just sends the hunk line to the line_fn callback).
> > + */
> > +void discard_hunk_line(void *, long, long, long, long, const char *, long);
>
> +/*
> + * Can be used as a no-op hunk_fn for xdi_diff_outf(), since a NULL
> + * one just sends the hunk line to the line_fn callback).
> + */
> +void discard_hunk_line(void *, long, long, long, long, const char *, long);
Recently we had the discussion on style and naming things.
On the one hand
Some callers of xdi_diff_outf() do not look at the generated hunk header
lines at all. By plugging in a no-op hunk callback, this tells xdiff not
to even bother formatting them.
This patch introduces a stock no-op callback and uses it with a few
callers whose line callbacks explicitly ignore hunk
4 matches
Mail list logo
