subject:"\[PATCH 3\/9\] t1300\: avoid relying on a bug"

Re: [PATCH 3/9] t1300: avoid relying on a bug

2018-03-30 Thread Johannes Schindelin

Hi Peff, On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > The test case 'unset with cont. lines' relied on a bug that is about to > > be fixed: it tests *explicitly* that removing the last entry from a > > config section leaves

Re: [PATCH 3/9] t1300: avoid relying on a bug

2018-03-29 Thread Jeff King

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > The test case 'unset with cont. lines' relied on a bug that is about to > be fixed: it tests *explicitly* that removing the last entry from a > config section leaves an *empty* section behind. > > Let's fix this test case not

[PATCH 3/9] t1300: avoid relying on a bug

2018-03-29 Thread Johannes Schindelin

The test case 'unset with cont. lines' relied on a bug that is about to be fixed: it tests *explicitly* that removing the last entry from a config section leaves an *empty* section behind. Let's fix this test case not to rely on that behavior, simply by preventing the section from becoming empty.