On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On 05/07/2013 06:47 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
wrote:
You conjectured earlier that nobody uses blob marks, and I provided a
counterexample.
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
CVS stores all of the revisions of a single file in a single filename,v
file in rcsfile(5) format. The revisions are stored as deltas ordered
so that a single revision can be reconstructed from a single serial read
of the file.
cvs2git reads
On 05/07/2013 09:12 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
CVS stores all of the revisions of a single file in a single filename,v
file in rcsfile(5) format. The revisions are stored as deltas ordered
so that a single revision can be reconstructed from a
On 05/03/2013 08:23 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
How do we know that this doesn't break any users of fast-import? Your
comment isn't very reassuring:
the vast majority
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 05/03/2013 08:23 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
How do we know that this doesn't break any users of fast-import? Your
On 05/06/2013 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 05/03/2013 08:23 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
How do we know that this
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 6 May 2013, Thomas Rast wrote:
The proposed patch wants to stop writing marks (in --export-marks) for
anything but commits.
Then it should not go in.
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
Yes, it can be handy to start loading the first blobfile in parallel
with the later stages of the conversion, before the second dumpfile is
ready. In that case the user needs to pass --export-marks to the first
fast-import process to export marks
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On 05/06/2013 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 05/03/2013 08:23 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch wrote:
Felipe
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 6 May 2013, Thomas Rast wrote:
The proposed patch wants to stop writing marks (in --export-marks) for
anything but commits.
Then it should not go in.
If that rationale was valid, no
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
Yes, it can be handy to start loading the first blobfile in parallel
with the later stages of the conversion, before the second dumpfile is
ready. In that case the user
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
Yes, it can be handy to start loading the first blobfile in parallel
with the later stages
On 05/06/2013 11:19 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
Yes, it can be handy to start loading the first blobfile in parallel
with the later stages of the conversion, before the
On 05/06/2013 11:36 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
This would simplify the documentation, and obliterate the need to use
mark files at all:
As explained in my other email, this documentation change does not
remove all of the reasons that users might want to use mark files. I
would still like to
On 05/06/2013 11:04 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On 05/06/2013 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 05/03/2013 08:23 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:56
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 7 May 2013, Michael Haggerty wrote:
I knew about the type command but I was under the impression that it
is intended for text files and can corrupt binary files. Are you sure
that
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On 05/06/2013 11:19 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
Yes, it can be handy to start loading the first
Hi,
On Tue, 7 May 2013, Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 05/06/2013 11:04 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
wrote:
On 05/06/2013 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast wrote:
So the proposed change would break a documented use of cvs2git.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 7 May 2013, Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 05/06/2013 11:04 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
wrote:
On 05/06/2013 12:32 PM,
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
There's no point in storing blob, they would increase the time of
loading the marks, and the vast majority of them will never be used
again.
This also makes fast-export and fast-import marks compatible.
[...]
- if
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
How do we know that this doesn't break any users of fast-import? Your
comment isn't very reassuring:
the vast majority of them will never be used again
So what's with
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
IIUC, you are unconditionally storing only marks to commit objects.
Are you allowed to do that at this point? I notice that
git-fast-export(1) says
--export-marks=file
Dumps the internal marks table to file when complete. Marks are
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
IIUC, you are unconditionally storing only marks to commit objects.
Are you allowed to do that at this point? I notice that
git-fast-export(1) says
--export-marks=file
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
A safe and sane approach may be to teach these an option to tell
them to omit non-commits or to emit all kinds, and make remote-bzr
use that to exclude non-commits.
This has nothing to do with remote-bzr, or any remote helper. These
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
A safe and sane approach may be to teach these an option to tell
them to omit non-commits or to emit all kinds, and make remote-bzr
use that to exclude non-commits.
There's no point in storing blob, they would increase the time of
loading the marks, and the vast majority of them will never be used
again.
This also makes fast-export and fast-import marks compatible.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
fast-import.c | 9 +++--
26 matches
Mail list logo
