Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
We should remove the support for -q in Git 2.0.
No. I hope you are teasing.
I don't mind seeing support for -q dropped, but I really don't think
it's worth delaying git 2.0 for that. Would s/in Git 2.0/in some
future
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
I don't mind seeing support for -q dropped, but I really don't think
it's worth delaying git 2.0 for that. Would s/in Git 2.0/in some
future release/ be ok?
I do not think keeping the support for -q in is any huge burden.
We
Junio C Hamano wrote:
We should remove the support for -q in Git 2.0.
No. I hope you are teasing.
I don't mind seeing support for -q dropped, but I really don't think
it's worth delaying git 2.0 for that. Would s/in Git 2.0/in some
future release/ be ok?
The patch text itself looks
This reimplements the ancient -q option to git diff-files that
was inherited from show-diff -q in terms of --diff-filter=d, and
issue a warning against the use of the former.
Incidentally this also tentatively fix git diff --no-index to
honor -q and hide deletions; the use will get the same
4 matches
Mail list logo