On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
I suggest a separate patch series dedicated to deleting *all* the extra
imap infrastructure at once. That being said, I'm not committing to do
so. (We could add it to an straightforward projects for aspiring git
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 11/29/2012 10:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
A side effect of this change is that the memory for each message is
freed after it is used rather than leaked, though that detail is
unimportant given that imap-send is a top-level command.
--
?
On 12/02/2012 02:48 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 11/29/2012 10:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
A side effect of this change is that the memory for each message is
freed after it is used rather than leaked, though that detail is
unimportant given
On 11/29/2012 10:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
struct msg_data stored (char *, len) of the data to be included in a
That (type, varname) is a bit funny notation, even though it is
understandable.
I understand that it is funny, but it seems like
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
struct msg_data stored (char *, len) of the data to be included in a
That (type, varname) is a bit funny notation, even though it is
understandable.
message, kept the character data NUL-terminated, etc., much like a
strbuf would do. So change it
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:30:54PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
For some reason, there is a bunch of infrastructure in this file for
dealing with IMAP flags, although there is nothing in the code that
actually allows any flags to be set. If there is no plan to add
support for flags in
struct msg_data stored (char *, len) of the data to be included in a
message, kept the character data NUL-terminated, etc., much like a
strbuf would do. So change it to use a struct strbuf. This makes the
code clearer and reduces copying a little bit.
A side effect of this change is that the
7 matches
Mail list logo
