On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
> I can't quite parse the first sentence in this paragraph. Perhaps something
> like this:
>
> To detect when a child has finished executing, we check interleaved
> with other actions (such as checking the liveliness of
This allows to run external commands in parallel with ordered output
on stderr.
If we run external commands in parallel we cannot pipe the output directly
to the our stdout/err as it would mix up. So each process's output will
flow through a pipe, which we buffer. One subprocess can be directly
Am 14.12.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Stefan Beller:
This allows to run external commands in parallel with ordered output
on stderr.
If we run external commands in parallel we cannot pipe the output directly
to the our stdout/err as it would mix up. So each process's output will
flow through a pipe,
Junio C Hamano writes:
> I may have comments on other parts of this patch, but I noticed this
> a bit hard to read while reading the end result.
> ...
I finished reading the remainder. Other than the above all look
sensible.
Will replace what had been queued.
Thanks.
--
To
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> + while (1) {
>> + int i;
>> + int output_timeout = 100;
>> + int spawn_cap = 4;
>> +
>> + if (!no_more_task) {
>> +
Stefan Beller writes:
> + while (1) {
> + int i;
> + int output_timeout = 100;
> + int spawn_cap = 4;
> +
> + if (!no_more_task) {
> + for (i = 0; i < spawn_cap; i++) {
> + int
This allows to run external commands in parallel with ordered output
on stderr.
If we run external commands in parallel we cannot pipe the output directly
to the our stdout/err as it would mix up. So each process's output will
flow through a pipe, which we buffer. One subprocess can be directly
7 matches
Mail list logo