Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
With v16 you can easily choose if you want to have the S-o-b in the
output or not, when there is already one, ...
By the way, I sent v16 just before the
From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
With v16 you can easily choose if you want to have the S-o-b in the
output or not, when there is already one, ...
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Christian Couder chrisc...@tuxfamily.org writes:
From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
If that is what happens, it is not a workable workaround to set Sob to
addIfDifferent only for this invocation.
Setting S-o-b to
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
With v16 you can easily choose if you want to have the S-o-b in the
output or not, when there is already one, ...
By the way, I sent v16 just before the above email, but the series
still hasn't hit the mailing
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:15:47AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
...
As a reminder, this old patchset (that I replied to) enhanced git am -s
with an option to
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:00:40PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:45:50AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
This is probably not as simple as you would like but it works with
something like:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:29:37AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
If I understand it correctly, Michael is envisioning to implement
his git am -s art (I would recommend against reusing -s for this,
though. git am --trailer art is fine) and doing so by using
interpret-trailers as an
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Optional parameters for arguments make backwards-compatibility tricky.
In this case, the command:
git am -s mbox1 mbox2
means apply the patches from mbox1 and mbox2, and signoff the patches.
Under your scheme, it now means apply from mbox2, and use the
From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
To an existing message ends with Michael's Signed-off-by:, if his
git am --trailer arts is called to add these three and then a
Signed-off-by: from him, should it add an
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
This is probably not as simple as you would like but it works with
something like:
$ git interpret-trailers --trailer Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
m...@redhat.com
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
To an existing message ends with Michael's Signed-off-by:, if his
git am --trailer arts is called to add these three and then a
Signed-off-by: from him, should it add an extra S-o-b (because his
existing S-o-b
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:45:50AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
This is probably not as simple as you would like but it works with
something like:
$ git interpret-trailers --trailer Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
What would be more interesting is if the primitives you have,
e.g. replace, append, etc. are sufficient to express his use
case and similar ones. For example, when working on multiple
trailers (e.g. am --trailer art would muck with three kinds), how
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Junio, Christian,
it's been a while.
I see that the work on trailers is going on.
I tried going over the documentation but I could not figure
out how would one implement multiple signatures using the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:45:50AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Junio, Christian,
it's been a while.
I see that the work on trailers is going on.
I tried going over the documentation but I
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
...
As a reminder, this old patchset (that I replied to) enhanced git am -s
with an option to add different signatures depending on
the option passed to the -s flag.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:51:04AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, after looking into this for a while, I realize
this is a special property of the Signed-off-by footer.
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Hi Junio, Christian,
it's been a while.
I see that the work on trailers is going on.
I tried going over the documentation but I could not figure
out how would one implement multiple signatures using the
trailers mechanism.
Good. Christian has
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, after looking into this for a while, I realize
this is a special property of the Signed-off-by footer.
For now I think it's reasonable to just avoid de-duplicating
other footers if any. Agree?
Not really. I'd
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:49:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, after looking into this for a while, I realize
this is a special property of the Signed-off-by footer.
For now I think it's reasonable to just
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, after looking into this for a while, I realize
this is a special property of the Signed-off-by footer.
For now I think it's reasonable to just avoid de-duplicating
other
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:51:04AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, after looking into this for a while, I realize
this is a special property of the Signed-off-by footer.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:06:20AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Now A wants to sign this patch.
I think there are two reasonable ways to behave:
1. What you describe above:
A
B
A
That is the only sensible thing to do for Signed-off-by
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Now A wants to sign this patch.
I think there are two reasonable ways to behave:
1. What you describe above:
A
B
A
That is the only sensible thing to do for Signed-off-by footers.
2. For things like Tested-by: tags, removing tag from
where it
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:32:09AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:07:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
...
1. new parameter am.signoff can be used any number
of times:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:07:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
I'm using different signature tags for git am depending on the patch,
project and other factors.
Sometimes I add multiple tags as well, e.g. QEMU
wants both Reviewed-by and
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:25:54PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
Am 12.06.2014 18:12, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ fall_back_3way () {
eval $cmd
GIT_INDEX_FILE=$dotest/patch-merge-tmp-index \
git write-tree $dotest/patch-merge-base+ ||
-cannot_fallback
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:07:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
...
1. new parameter am.signoff can be used any number
of times:
[am]
signoff = Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
I'm using different signature tags for git am depending on the patch,
project and other factors.
Sometimes I add multiple tags as well, e.g. QEMU
wants both Reviewed-by and Signed-off-by tags.
This patch makes it easy to do so:
1. new parameter am.signoff can be used any number
of
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
I'm using different signature tags for git am depending on the patch,
project and other factors.
Sometimes I add multiple tags as well, e.g. QEMU
wants both Reviewed-by and Signed-off-by tags.
This patch makes it easy to do so:
1. new parameter
Am 12.06.2014 18:12, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ fall_back_3way () {
eval $cmd
GIT_INDEX_FILE=$dotest/patch-merge-tmp-index \
git write-tree $dotest/patch-merge-base+ ||
-cannot_fallback $(gettext Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way
31 matches
Mail list logo
