Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Whether the option value is a separate argument in argv, or directly
stuck to the option.
stuck: gitk -L:foo:main.c
unstuck: gitk -L :foo:main.c
Existing gitk chokes on 'gitk -S foo', but works with 'git
Thomas Rast wrote:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Existing gitk chokes on 'gitk -S foo', but works with 'git -Sfoo'.
I somehow thought that we encourage the stuck/sticked form, to
reduce things the users need to remember to cope better with
Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org writes:
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 29.07.2013 21:37, schrieb Thomas Rast:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Now
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Whether the option value is a separate argument in argv, or directly
stuck to the option.
stuck: gitk -L:foo:main.c
unstuck: gitk -L :foo:main.c
Existing gitk chokes on 'gitk -S foo', but works with 'git -Sfoo'.
I somehow thought that we encourage
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 29.07.2013 21:37, schrieb Thomas Rast:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 29.07.2013 21:37, schrieb Thomas Rast:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the
corresponding change to gitk.
Paul, any news on this? Any
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the
corresponding change to gitk.
Paul, any news on this? Any chance we can get it into the next release,
since that will also be the first release
Am 29.07.2013 21:37, schrieb Thomas Rast:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the
corresponding change to gitk.
Paul, any news on this? Any chance we can get it into the next
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the
corresponding change to gitk.
Paul, any news on this? Any chance we can get it into the next release,
since that will also be the first release to ship with 'git log -L'?
--
Thomas
Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the
corresponding change to gitk.
The hard part is that AFAICS this is the first history display
accessible through gitk that can only be computed in one go. The
existing displays all work by having git-log perform a preliminary
10 matches
Mail list logo