Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-10-13 Thread Thomas Rast
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Whether the option value is a separate argument in argv, or directly stuck to the option. stuck: gitk -L:foo:main.c unstuck: gitk -L :foo:main.c Existing gitk chokes on 'gitk -S foo', but works with 'git

Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-10-13 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Thomas Rast wrote: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Existing gitk chokes on 'gitk -S foo', but works with 'git -Sfoo'. I somehow thought that we encourage the stuck/sticked form, to reduce things the users need to remember to cope better with

Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-08-19 Thread Thomas Rast
Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org writes: Hi Thomas, On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote: Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes: Am 29.07.2013 21:37, schrieb Thomas Rast: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Now

Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-08-19 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Whether the option value is a separate argument in argv, or directly stuck to the option. stuck: gitk -L:foo:main.c unstuck: gitk -L :foo:main.c Existing gitk chokes on 'gitk -S foo', but works with 'git -Sfoo'. I somehow thought that we encourage

Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-08-18 Thread Paul Mackerras
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote: Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes: Am 29.07.2013 21:37, schrieb Thomas Rast: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's

Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-07-31 Thread Thomas Rast
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes: Am 29.07.2013 21:37, schrieb Thomas Rast: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the corresponding change to gitk. Paul, any news on this? Any

Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-07-29 Thread Thomas Rast
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the corresponding change to gitk. Paul, any news on this? Any chance we can get it into the next release, since that will also be the first release

Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-07-29 Thread Jens Lehmann
Am 29.07.2013 21:37, schrieb Thomas Rast: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the corresponding change to gitk. Paul, any news on this? Any chance we can get it into the next

Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-07-23 Thread Thomas Rast
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes: Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the corresponding change to gitk. Paul, any news on this? Any chance we can get it into the next release, since that will also be the first release to ship with 'git log -L'? -- Thomas

[PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L

2013-06-09 Thread Thomas Rast
Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the corresponding change to gitk. The hard part is that AFAICS this is the first history display accessible through gitk that can only be computed in one go. The existing displays all work by having git-log perform a preliminary