On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Jameson Miller
wrote:
> I would be interested to understand how the
> mem_pool would fit your needs, and if it is sufficient or needs modification
> for your use cases.
>
>> [1] proof of concept in patches nearby
>> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180206001749.21894
On 04/20/2018 07:34 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:34:39 +
Jameson Miller wrote:
Jameson Miller (5):
read-cache: teach refresh_cache_entry to take istate
Add an API creating / discarding cache_entry structs
mem-pool: fill out functionality
Allocate cache entri
On 04/20/2018 01:49 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
base-commit: cafaccae98f749ebf33495aec42ea25060de8682
I couldn't quite figure out what these five patches were based on,
even with this line. Basing on and referring to a commit that is
not part of our published history with "base-commit" is not a
On 04/18/2018 12:49 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jameson Miller writes:
This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by
reducing the number of malloc() calls. ...
Jameson Miller (5):
read-cache: teach refresh_cache_entry to take istate
Add an API creating / discarding ca
On 04/17/2018 02:39 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
On 4/17/2018 12:34 PM, Jameson Miller wrote:
100K
Test baseline [4] block_allocation
0002.1: read_cache/discard_cache 1 times
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:34:39 +
Jameson Miller wrote:
> Jameson Miller (5):
> read-cache: teach refresh_cache_entry to take istate
> Add an API creating / discarding cache_entry structs
> mem-pool: fill out functionality
> Allocate cache entries from memory pools
> Add optional memor
>> base-commit: cafaccae98f749ebf33495aec42ea25060de8682
>
> I couldn't quite figure out what these five patches were based on,
> even with this line. Basing on and referring to a commit that is
> not part of our published history with "base-commit" is not all that
> useful to others.
I'd like to
Jameson Miller writes:
> This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by
> reducing the number of malloc() calls. ...
>
> Jameson Miller (5):
> read-cache: teach refresh_cache_entry to take istate
> Add an API creating / discarding cache_entry structs
> mem-pool: fill out f
On 4/17/2018 12:34 PM, Jameson Miller wrote:
100K
Test baseline [4] block_allocation
0002.1: read_cache/discard_cache 1 times 0.03(0.01+0.01)0.02(0.01+0.01
This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by
reducing the number of malloc() calls. Loading the index from disk is
partly dominated by the time in malloc(), which is called for each
index entry. This patch series reduces the number of times malloc() is
called as part of loading
This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by
reducing the number of malloc() calls. Loading the index from disk is
partly dominated by the time in malloc(), which is called for each
index entry. This patch series reduces the number of times malloc() is
called as part of loading
11 matches
Mail list logo
