On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Christian Couder
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Christian Couder
wrote:
>
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Christian Couder
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Christian Couder
>>> wrote:
+void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
+
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Christian Couder
>> wrote:
>>> +void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
>>> +{
>>> + if (istate->split_index) {
>>> +
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Christian Couder
> wrote:
>> +void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
>> +{
>> + if (istate->split_index) {
>> + /*
>> +* can't discard_split_index(&the_index); b
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> +void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
> +{
> + if (istate->split_index) {
> + /*
> +* can't discard_split_index(&the_index); because that
> +* will destroy split_index->bas
Also use the functions in cmd_update_index() in
builtin/update-index.c.
These functions will be used in a following commit to tweak
our use of the split-index feature depending on the setting
of a configuration variable.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
builtin/update-index.c | 18 ++
6 matches
Mail list logo