On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:58:23AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:26 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 01:06:42PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> >> This passes the pathspec, more or less unmodified, to
> >> git-add--interactive. The command itself does
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:26 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 01:06:42PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> This passes the pathspec, more or less unmodified, to
>> git-add--interactive. The command itself does not process pathspec. It
>> simply passes the pathspec to other bui
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 01:06:42PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> This passes the pathspec, more or less unmodified, to
> git-add--interactive. The command itself does not process pathspec. It
> simply passes the pathspec to other builtin commands. So if all those
> commands support pathspec,
This passes the pathspec, more or less unmodified, to
git-add--interactive. The command itself does not process pathspec. It
simply passes the pathspec to other builtin commands. So if all those
commands support pathspec, we're good.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
builtin/add.c | 2
4 matches
Mail list logo