On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 05:13:02PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:54:17PM +, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > > If an extra connection isn't a problem, you might be better off with
> > > "git ls-remote", and then picking through the results for refs of
> > > interest, and
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:54:17PM +, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > If an extra connection isn't a problem, you might be better off with
> > "git ls-remote", and then picking through the results for refs of
> > interest, and then "git fetch-pack" to actually get the pack. That's how
> > git-fetch
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:48:49AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 09:43:02AM +, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > > Looking deeper, we do not need these trees and blobs at all. The problem
> > > is really just a tag that peels to an object that is not otherwise a ref
> > > tip,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 09:43:02AM +, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > Looking deeper, we do not need these trees and blobs at all. The problem
> > is really just a tag that peels to an object that is not otherwise a ref
> > tip, regardless of its type.
>
> Thanks for feedback and for coming up
Jeff,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:53:57AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:28:23AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> > > Subject: fetch-pack: don't try to fetch peeled values with --all
> > > [...]
> > > Original report and
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:28:23AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> > Subject: fetch-pack: don't try to fetch peeled values with --all
> > [...]
> > Original report and test from Kirill Smelkov.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov
> >
6 matches
Mail list logo
