Re: [PATCH v2] t0027: Add repoMIX and LF_nul

2015-04-25 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 2015-04-25 18.41, Junio C Hamano wrote: Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de writes: new safer autocrlf handling: Check if eols in a file are converted at commit, when the file has CR (or CLLF) in the repo (technically speaking in the index). s/CLLF/CRLF/? (no need to resend for

Re: [PATCH v2] t0027: Add repoMIX and LF_nul

2015-04-25 Thread Junio C Hamano
Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de writes: Hmph, would it still make sense to make sure that CRLF will stay CRLF so that future changes to break this expectation can be caught? Not that such a breakage is likely... Thanks for amending. We have the file CRLF (and CRLFmixLF), where we check

[PATCH v2] t0027: Add repoMIX and LF_nul

2015-04-25 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
new safer autocrlf handling: Check if eols in a file are converted at commit, when the file has CR (or CLLF) in the repo (technically speaking in the index). Add a test-file repoMIX with mixed line-endings. When converting LF-CRLF or CRLF-LF: check the warnings checkout_files():

Re: [PATCH v2] t0027: Add repoMIX and LF_nul

2015-04-25 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Torsten, On 2015-04-25 08:47, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: new safer autocrlf handling: Check if eols in a file are converted at commit, when the file has CR (or CLLF) in the repo (technically speaking in the index). Add a test-file repoMIX with mixed line-endings. When converting

Re: [PATCH v2] t0027: Add repoMIX and LF_nul

2015-04-25 Thread Junio C Hamano
Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de writes: new safer autocrlf handling: Check if eols in a file are converted at commit, when the file has CR (or CLLF) in the repo (technically speaking in the index). s/CLLF/CRLF/? (no need to resend for this; I'll locally amend) Add a test-file