Hi,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> In our tests with large repositories, we noticed a serious regression of the
> performance of git rebase when using the built-in vs the shell script
> version. It boils down to an incorrect conversion of a git checkout -q:
>
In our tests with large repositories, we noticed a serious regression of the
performance of git rebase when using the built-in vs the shell script
version. It boils down to an incorrect conversion of a git checkout -q:
instead of using a twoway_merge as git checkout does, we used a oneway_merge
2 matches
Mail list logo
