RE: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allocate cache entries from memory pool

org; > gits...@pobox.com; jonathanta...@google.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allocate cache entries from memory pool > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> To me it is also a clear yes when it comes to combining these

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allocate cache entries from memory pool

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote: > >> To me it is also a clear yes when it comes to combining these >> two memory pools. > > I also did not notice that jm/mem-pool already landed in master. Oh, thanks for telling! Now that I look at it, I am doubting it; The

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allocate cache entries from memory pool

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 7:21 PM, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Jameson Miller wrote: >>> This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allocate cache entries from memory pool

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Jameson Miller wrote: >> This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by >> reducing the number of malloc() calls. Loading the index from disk is >>

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allocate cache entries from memory pool

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Jameson Miller wrote: > This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by > reducing the number of malloc() calls. Loading the index from disk is > partly dominated by the time in malloc(), which is called for each > index

[PATCH v2 0/5] Allocate cache entries from memory pool

Changes from V1: - Based patch series off of commit in master - Minor updates based on initial code review feedback Summary: This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by reducing the number of malloc() calls. Loading the index from disk is partly dominated by the time in