Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] sequencer: dont't fork git commit

Phillip Wood writes: > Are you happy with the '--signoff' is handled (I didn't modify my > changes in the last iteration as you were still thinking about it)? I am not, but I am not unhappy, either. As I understand from your responses, it seems that the existing code

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] sequencer: dont't fork git commit

On 10/11/17 19:21, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Phillip Wood writes: > >> Here's the summary from the previous version >> These patches teach the sequencer to create commits without forking >> git commit when the commit message does not need to be edited. This >> speeds up

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] sequencer: dont't fork git commit

Phillip Wood writes: > Here's the summary from the previous version > These patches teach the sequencer to create commits without forking > git commit when the commit message does not need to be edited. This > speeds up cherry picking 10 commits by 26% and picking 10

[PATCH v2 0/9] sequencer: dont't fork git commit

From: Phillip Wood Thanks for the feedback on v1 I've updated the patches as suggested. See the comments on each patch for what has changed. I've added a patch to the start of the series to test the commit messages of intermediate squashes. I've added this as the RFC