Hi Brian,
On Wed, 30 May 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:14:06AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > Good point. I remember my initial reaction to the file names was
> > expecting some hungarian notation, which totally didn't make sense, so
> > I refrained from commenting.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:14:06AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> Good point. I remember my initial reaction to the file names was expecting
> some hungarian notation, which totally didn't make sense, so I refrained from
> commenting. Searching the web for the algorithm, maybe 'lapjv.c' is
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:55 AM, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>> The Jonker-Volgenant algorithm was implemented to answer questions such
>> as: given two different versions of a topic branch (or iterations of a
>> patch series), what is the best pairing of commits/patches between the
>> different
> The Jonker-Volgenant algorithm was implemented to answer questions such
> as: given two different versions of a topic branch (or iterations of a
> patch series), what is the best pairing of commits/patches between the
> different versions?
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
> ---
>
Hi Peff,
On Sat, 5 May 2018, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 05:34:29PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > The Jonker-Volgenant algorithm was implemented to answer questions such
> > as: given two different versions of a topic branch (or iterations of a
> > patch series), what
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 05:34:29PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> The Jonker-Volgenant algorithm was implemented to answer questions such
> as: given two different versions of a topic branch (or iterations of a
> patch series), what is the best pairing of commits/patches between the
>
The Jonker-Volgenant algorithm was implemented to answer questions such
as: given two different versions of a topic branch (or iterations of a
patch series), what is the best pairing of commits/patches between the
different versions?
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
7 matches
Mail list logo