Hi Alban
On 02/11/2018 16:26, Alban Gruin wrote:
Hi Phillip,
Le 02/11/2018 à 11:09, Phillip Wood a écrit :
+ struct todo_item *items = NULL,
+ base_item = {TODO_EXEC, NULL, 0, 0, commands_len, 0};
+
+ strbuf_addstr(buf, commands);
+ base_item.offset_in_buf = buf->len -
Hi Phillip,
Le 02/11/2018 à 11:09, Phillip Wood a écrit :
+ struct todo_item *items = NULL,
+ base_item = {TODO_EXEC, NULL, 0, 0, commands_len, 0};
+
+ strbuf_addstr(buf, commands);
+ base_item.offset_in_buf = buf->len - commands_len - 1;
+
Hi Alban
On 01/11/2018 23:31, Alban Gruin wrote:
> Le 30/10/2018 à 17:47, Phillip Wood a écrit :
>> On 27/10/2018 22:29, Alban Gruin wrote:
>>> This refactors sequencer_add_exec_commands() to work on a todo_list to
>>> avoid redundant reads and writes to the disk.
>>>
>>> An obvious way to do
Le 30/10/2018 à 17:47, Phillip Wood a écrit :
> On 27/10/2018 22:29, Alban Gruin wrote:
>> This refactors sequencer_add_exec_commands() to work on a todo_list to
>> avoid redundant reads and writes to the disk.
>>
>> An obvious way to do this would be to insert the `exec' command between
>> the
On 27/10/2018 22:29, Alban Gruin wrote:
This refactors sequencer_add_exec_commands() to work on a todo_list to
avoid redundant reads and writes to the disk.
An obvious way to do this would be to insert the `exec' command between
the other commands, and reparse it once this is done. This is not
This refactors sequencer_add_exec_commands() to work on a todo_list to
avoid redundant reads and writes to the disk.
An obvious way to do this would be to insert the `exec' command between
the other commands, and reparse it once this is done. This is not what
is done here. Instead, the command
6 matches
Mail list logo
