Jeff King writes:
> The patch itself is obviously an improvement. It may be worth graduating
> separately from the rest of the series.
Yup, I will split it out to bc/push-cert-receive-fix that builds
directly on an ancient jc/push-cert topic that was merged at
v2.2.0-rc0~64.
I'll need to drop t
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 04:01:28PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> If we had already processed the last newline in a push certificate, we
> would end up subtracting NULL from the end-of-certificate pointer when
> computing the length of the line. This would have resulted in an
> absurdly large l
If we had already processed the last newline in a push certificate, we
would end up subtracting NULL from the end-of-certificate pointer when
computing the length of the line. This would have resulted in an
absurdly large length, and possibly a buffer overflow. Instead,
subtract the beginning-of-
3 matches
Mail list logo
