Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] unpack-trees: don't respect submodule.update

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Brandon Williams writes: > >> The 'submodule.update' config was historically used and respected by the >> 'submodule update' command because update handled a variety of different >> ways it updated a

Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] unpack-trees: don't respect submodule.update

Brandon Williams writes: > The 'submodule.update' config was historically used and respected by the > 'submodule update' command because update handled a variety of different > ways it updated a submodule. As we begin teaching other commands about > submodules it makes more

Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] unpack-trees: don't respect submodule.update

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > The 'submodule.update' config was historically used and respected by the > 'submodule update' command because update handled a variety of different > ways it updated a submodule. As we begin teaching other commands

[PATCH v2 08/15] unpack-trees: don't respect submodule.update

The 'submodule.update' config was historically used and respected by the 'submodule update' command because update handled a variety of different ways it updated a submodule. As we begin teaching other commands about submodules it makes more sense for the different settings of 'submodule.update'