Eric Sunshine writes:
> Alternately, update test_path_foo() functions to accept multiple
> pathnames, or is that too ugly?
That actually would have been my first choice, except (1) that
path_is_missing has a cruft whose usefulness is dubious, and (2)
that "path_exists A B C" and "path_is_missing
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> James writes:
>> @@ -46,15 +46,15 @@ test_expect_success 'git clean' '
>> mkdir -p build docs &&
>> touch a.out src/part3.c docs/manual.txt obj.o build/lib.so &&
>> git clean &&
>> - test -f Makefile &&
>> - test -f
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:58 AM, James wrote:
> From: James Rouzier
This would be a good place to explain how you are modernizing the test
script. Right now, you're just updating to take advantage of
test_path_is_foo(), but some other modernizations you could do
include:
* using '>' rather than
James writes:
> From: James Rouzier
>
> ---
Missing sign-off.
> t/t7300-clean.sh | 382
> +++
> 1 file changed, 190 insertions(+), 192 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t7300-clean.sh b/t/t7300-clean.sh
> index 86ceb38..d555bb6 100755
> --- a
From: James Rouzier
---
t/t7300-clean.sh | 382 +++
1 file changed, 190 insertions(+), 192 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t7300-clean.sh b/t/t7300-clean.sh
index 86ceb38..d555bb6 100755
--- a/t/t7300-clean.sh
+++ b/t/t7300-clean.sh
@@ -28,15 +28,
5 matches
Mail list logo