On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:05:04PM +0100, Nickolai Belakovski wrote:
> I think if we move to making this atom just store worktree path, that
> needs to be implemented as a hashmap of refname->wtpath, which would
> also solve this string_list issue, correct? Just making sure I'm not
> missing
I think if we move to making this atom just store worktree path, that
needs to be implemented as a hashmap of refname->wtpath, which would
also solve this string_list issue, correct? Just making sure I'm not
missing something before I submit another patch.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:38 AM Junio C
Jeff King writes:
>> I wonder if "The worktree at /local/src/wt1 has this branch checked
>> out" is something the user of %(worktree) atom, or a variant thereof
>> e.g. "%(worktree:detailed)", may want to learn, but because that
>> information is lost when this function returns, such an
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 03:58:30PM -0800, nbelakov...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Nickolai Belakovski
>
> Add an atom expressing whether the particular ref is checked out in a
> linked worktree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nickolai Belakovski
> ---
> ref-filter.c | 31
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:11:23PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > + }
> > +
> > + string_list_sort(>u.worktree_heads);
> > +
> > + free_worktrees(worktrees);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> So..., this function collects any and all branches that are checked
> out in some worktree, and sort
nbelakov...@gmail.com writes:
>
> +static int worktree_head_atom_parser(const struct ref_format *format,
> + struct
> used_atom *atom,
> + const
> char
From: Nickolai Belakovski
Add an atom expressing whether the particular ref is checked out in a
linked worktree.
Signed-off-by: Nickolai Belakovski
---
ref-filter.c | 31 +++
t/t6302-for-each-ref-filter.sh | 15 +++
2 files changed, 46
7 matches
Mail list logo
