Felipe Contreras wrote:
---
sha1_name.c | 30 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
How has this changed since my eyeballing of the previous version? An
inter-diff would be nice: having spent a significant amount of time
looking at this area, I can
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
---
sha1_name.c | 30 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
How has this changed since my eyeballing of the previous version? An
inter-diff
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Through the years the functionality to handle @{-N} and @{u} has moved
around the code, and as a result, code that once made sense, doesn't any
more.
There is no need to call this function recursively with the branch of
@{-N} substituted
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Also, a few points this patch highlights in the code before the
change:
- If we were on a branch with 40-hex name at nth prior checkout,
would we mistake it as being detached at the commit?
- If we were on a branch 'foo' at nth prior checkout,
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Through the years the functionality to handle @{-N} and @{u} has moved
around the code, and as a result, code that once made sense, doesn't any
more.
There is no need
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Through the years the functionality to handle @{-N} and @{u} has moved
around the code, and as a result, code that
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Through the years the functionality to
Through the years the functionality to handle @{-N} and @{u} has moved
around the code, and as a result, code that once made sense, doesn't any
more.
There is no need to call this function recursively with the branch of
@{-N} substituted because dwim_{ref,log} already replaces it.
However,
8 matches
Mail list logo