Change the documentation for --list so that it's described as a
toggle, not as an option that takes a as an argument.
Junio initially documented this in b867c7c23a ("git-tag: -l to list
tags (usability).", 2006-02-17), but later Jeff King changed "tag" to
accept multiple patterns in 588d0e834b ("
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> And after Jeff's change, one that took multiple patterns:
>
> git tag --list 'v*rc*' --list '*2.8*'
I do not think this is a correct depiction of the evolution, and is
a confusing description. It should say
git tag --list 'v*rc*' '*2.8*'
instead.
Wh
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>> And after Jeff's change, one that took multiple patterns:
>>
>> git tag --list 'v*rc*' --list '*2.8*'
>
> I do not think this is a correct depiction of the evolution, and is
> a confusing descriptio
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>> Please drop "interleaved", as we are not encouraging GNUism. We
>> just tolerate it but do not guarantee to keep them working.
>
> This brings up the same point you made in
> , I replied to in
> ,
> and that you didn't get back to me about.
>
> Rather than spli
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> Yes, all of this is correct, but not relevant to what I'm describing
> in the commit message, because I'm making a documentation change and
> describing how you *would* expect git to work if you read the
> *documentation*, not if you read the code.
OK.
>>> +-l:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>>> Please drop "interleaved", as we are not encouraging GNUism. We
>>> just tolerate it but do not guarantee to keep them working.
>>
>> This brings up the same point you made in
>> , I replied to in
>>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> of things you think we should be putting in the test suite. I.e.
> should the tests be:
>
> a) Only be a collection of invocations of git we'd be comfortable
> showing to someone as "this works, and this is how you should do it",
> or things that explicitly fail
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:26:21PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
> > of things you think we should be putting in the test suite. I.e.
> > should the tests be:
> >
> > a) Only be a collection of invocations of git we'd be comfortable
> > showing to someone as "t
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:26:21PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>>
>> > of things you think we should be putting in the test suite. I.e.
>> > should the tests be:
>> >
>> > a) Only be a collection of invocat
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> Junio would you be fine with just this on top:
>
> diff --git a/t/README b/t/README
> index 4982d1c521..9e079a360a 100644
> --- a/t/README
> +++ b/t/README
> @@ -379,2 +379,5 @@ Do:
>
> + - Include tests which assert that the desired & recommended behavior
> +
10 matches
Mail list logo