On 6 October 2017 at 14:02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Martin Ågren writes:
>
>> On 6 October 2017 at 04:01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Martin Ågren writes:
>>>
v2: Except for the slightly different
Martin Ågren writes:
> On 6 October 2017 at 04:01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Martin Ågren writes:
>>
>>> v2: Except for the slightly different documentation in cache.h, this is
>>> a squash of the last two patches of v1. I hope
On 6 October 2017 at 04:01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Martin Ågren writes:
>
>> v2: Except for the slightly different documentation in cache.h, this is
>> a squash of the last two patches of v1. I hope the commit message is
>> better.
>
> Yeah, it is long
Martin Ågren writes:
> v2: Except for the slightly different documentation in cache.h, this is
> a squash of the last two patches of v1. I hope the commit message is
> better.
Yeah, it is long ;-) but readable.
Thanks.
If the original version of `write_locked_index()` returned with an
error, it didn't roll back the lockfile unless the error occured at the
very end, during closing/committing. See commit 03b866477 (read-cache:
new API write_locked_index instead of write_index/write_cache,
2014-06-13).
In commit
5 matches
Mail list logo