Am 3/27/2014 19:48, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
From: Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:21:46 +0400
...
By the way, in general I do not appreciate people lying on the Date:
with an in-body header in their patches, either in the original or
in rerolls.
format-patch is
Am 28.03.2014 18:06, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johannes Sixt j.s...@viscovery.net writes:
Am 3/27/2014 19:48, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
From: Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:21:46 +0400
...
By the way, in general I do not appreciate people lying on the Date:
with an
Am 28.03.2014 19:36, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org writes:
Am 28.03.2014 18:06, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johannes Sixt j.s...@viscovery.net writes:
Am 3/27/2014 19:48, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
From: Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:21:46 +0400
Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org writes:
My reading of git-send-email is:
* $time = time - scalar $#files prepares the initial timestamp,
so that running two git send-email back to back will give
timestamps to the series sent out by the first invocation that
are older than the ones
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 02:34:24PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:46:32AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
What are the downsides of __ prefix by the way?
Aren't these names
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
(please keep author email)
8
From: Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:21:46 +0400
Subject: [PATCH v3a] tree-diff: rework diff_tree interface to be sha1 based
git am -c will discard everything above the scissors and
+stefanbeller
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:48:11AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
(please keep author email)
8
From: Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:21:46 +0400
Subject: [PATCH v3a] tree-diff: rework diff_tree
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:46:32AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
What are the downsides of __ prefix by the way?
Aren't these names reserved for compiler/runtime implementations?
Yes, but there are precedents when people don't obey it widely and
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:46:32AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
What are the downsides of __ prefix by the way?
Aren't these names reserved for compiler/runtime implementations?
Yes, but there are
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:36:22PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru writes:
The downside is that try_to_follow_renames(), if active, we cause
re-reading of 2 initial trees, which was negligible based on my timings,
That would depend on how often the codepath
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
What are the downsides of __ prefix by the way?
Aren't these names reserved for compiler/runtime implementations?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru writes:
The downside is that try_to_follow_renames(), if active, we cause
re-reading of 2 initial trees, which was negligible based on my timings,
That would depend on how often the codepath triggered in your test
case, but is totally understandable. It fires
12 matches
Mail list logo
