On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
However this means that the progress meter will now be wrong and that's
terrible ! Users *will* complain that the meter doesn't reach 100% and
they'll protest for being denied the
nr_objects in the next patch is used to reflect the number of actual
objects in the stream, which may be smaller than the number recorded
in pack header.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
---
builtin/index-pack.c | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
nr_objects in the next patch is used to reflect the number of actual
objects in the stream, which may be smaller than the number recorded
in pack header.
This highlights an issue that has been nagging me for a while.
We decided to send the
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
... I was
wondering if some kind of prefix to the pack stream could be inserted
onto the wire when sending a pack v4. Something like:
'T', 'H', 'I', 'N', actual_number_of_sent_objects_in_network_order
This 8-byte prefix would simply be
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
nr_objects in the next patch is used to reflect the number of actual
objects in the stream, which may be smaller than the number recorded
in pack header.
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
nr_objects in the next patch is used to reflect the number of actual
objects in the stream, which may be smaller than the number recorded
in pack header.
This highlights an issue that has been nagging me
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
... I was
wondering if some kind of prefix to the pack stream could be inserted
onto the wire when sending a pack v4. Something like:
'T', 'H', 'I', 'N',
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
Do we know the actual number of objects to send during the capability
negociation?
No, and that is not what I meant. We know upfront after capability
negotiation (by seeing a request to give them a thin-pack) that we
will send, in addition to the usual
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
Do we know the actual number of objects to send during the capability
negociation?
No, and that is not what I meant. We know upfront after capability
negotiation (by seeing a request to give them a
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
However this means that the progress meter will now be wrong and that's
terrible ! Users *will* complain that the meter doesn't reach 100% and
they'll protest for being denied the remaining objects during the
transfer !
10 matches
Mail list logo