On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With the current show_files() "ls -tcm" will show
>
> foo.c
> M foo.c
>
> The first item is redundant. If "foo.c" is modified, we know it's in
> the cache. Introduce show_files_compact to do that because ls-files is
> plumbing and scripts may already depend on current display behavior.
>
> Another difference in show_files_compact() is it does not show
> skip-worktree (aka outside sparse checkout) entries anymore, which
> makes sense in porcelain context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com>
> ---
> builtin/ls-files.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/ls-files.c b/builtin/ls-files.c
> index 709d8b1..cd8e35c 100644
> --- a/builtin/ls-files.c
> +++ b/builtin/ls-files.c
> @@ -337,6 +337,53 @@ static void show_files(struct dir_struct *dir)
> }
> }
>
> +static void show_files_compact(struct dir_struct *dir)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + /* For cached/deleted files we don't need to even do the readdir */
> + if (show_others || show_killed) {
> + if (!show_others)
> + dir->flags |= DIR_COLLECT_KILLED_ONLY;
> + fill_directory(dir, &pathspec);
> + if (show_others)
> + show_other_files(dir);
> + if (show_killed)
> + show_killed_files(dir);
> + }
> + if (!(show_cached || show_stage || show_deleted || show_modified))
> + return;
> + for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) {
> + const struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
> + struct stat st;
> + int err, shown = 0;
> + if ((dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_IGNORED) &&
> + !ce_excluded(dir, ce))
> + continue;
> + if (show_unmerged && !ce_stage(ce))
> + continue;
> + if (ce->ce_flags & CE_UPDATE)
> + continue;
> + if (ce_skip_worktree(ce))
> + continue;
> + err = lstat(ce->name, &st);
> + if (show_deleted && err) {
> + show_ce_entry(tag_removed, ce);
> + shown = 1;
> + }
> + if (show_modified && ce_modified(ce, &st, 0)) {
Is it possible for the lstat() to have failed for some reason when we
get here? If so, relying upon 'st' is unsafe, isn't it?
> + show_ce_entry(tag_modified, ce);
> + shown = 1;
> + }
> + if (ce_stage(ce)) {
> + show_ce_entry(tag_unmerged, ce);
> + shown = 1;
> + }
> + if (!shown && show_cached)
> + show_ce_entry(tag_cached, ce);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Prune the index to only contain stuff starting with "prefix"
> */
> @@ -606,7 +653,10 @@ static int ls_files(const char **argv, const char
> *prefix)
> refresh_index(&the_index, REFRESH_QUIET, &pathspec, NULL,
> NULL);
> setup_pager();
> }
> - show_files(&dir);
> + if (porcelain)
> + show_files_compact(&dir);
> + else
> + show_files(&dir);
> if (show_resolve_undo)
> show_ru_info();
>
> --
> 1.9.1.345.ga1a145c
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
