Chris,
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:39:39PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 31/05/14 08:58, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> > From signal(2) man page:
> >
...
> > - signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);
> > + memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
> > + sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
> > + sigaction(SIGCHLD, &sa, 0);
>
> I
On 31/05/14 08:58, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> From signal(2) man page:
>
> The behavior of signal() varies across UNIX versions, and has also var‐
> ied historically across different versions of Linux. Avoid its use:
> use sigaction(2) instead.
>
> Replaced signal() with sigaction() in co
Jeremiah Mahler writes:
> From signal(2) man page:
>
> The behavior of signal() varies across UNIX versions, and has also var‐
> ied historically across different versions of Linux. Avoid its use:
> use sigaction(2) instead.
I don't think this matters for SIG_DFL or SIG_IGN.
Andreas.
>From signal(2) man page:
The behavior of signal() varies across UNIX versions, and has also var‐
ied historically across different versions of Linux. Avoid its use:
use sigaction(2) instead.
Replaced signal() with sigaction() in connect.c
Signed-off-by: Jeremiah Mahler
---
connect.c
4 matches
Mail list logo