On 11/10/2014 12:47 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Some updates from the test lab, Windows 7
Working means git update-index --untracked-cache reports Testing...OK
Rejected means ..does not change..
cygwin + NTFS: Working
cygwin + VFAT: Rejected
The same good news for Msysgit, running your github branch
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
--- a/test-dump-untracked-cache.c
+++ b/test-dump-untracked-cache.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
{
struct untracked_cache *uc;
struct strbuf base = STRBUF_INIT;
+
On 2014-11-08 10.39, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
If the user enables untracked cache, then
- move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
How do we detect this move ?
Shouldn't we be able to detect an unsupported file system
(by probing if stat(root_dir_of_repo) ==
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
On 2014-11-08 10.39, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
If the user enables untracked cache, then
- move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
How do we detect this move ?
Shouldn't we be able to detect an unsupported file
If the user enables untracked cache, then
- move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
- or simply upgrade OS
- or move the whole (portable) disk from one machine to another
- or access a shared fs from another machine
there's no guarantee that untracked cache can still function properly.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
If the user enables untracked cache, then
- move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
- or simply upgrade OS
- or move the whole (portable) disk from one machine to another
- or access a shared fs from another
6 matches
Mail list logo
