Hi Hannes,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 14.12.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Jeff King:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:53:23AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> >
> > > I don't have a strong opinion on the patches under discussion, but
> > > here are a few pointers on the run-command interface:
Am 14.12.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Jeff King:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:53:23AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
I wanted to see what it would look like if we make it the caller's
responsibility to throw away stderr. The patch is below, as fi
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:53:23AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
> > I wanted to see what it would look like if we make it the caller's
> > responsibility to throw away stderr. The patch is below, as fixup
> > of patch 29/34. The change
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> I wanted to see what it would look like if we make it the caller's
> responsibility to throw away stderr. The patch is below, as fixup
> of patch 29/34. The change is gross, but the end result is not that
> bad, though not really a d
Am 13.12.2016 um 16:32 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> This will be needed to hide the output of `git commit` when the
> sequencer handles an interactive rebase's script.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
> ---
> run-command.c | 23 +++
> run-command.h | 1 +
> 2 files c
This will be needed to hide the output of `git commit` when the
sequencer handles an interactive rebase's script.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
run-command.c | 23 +++
run-command.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c
6 matches
Mail list logo
