On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:24:41PM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> When transmitting and receiving POSTs for protocol v0 and v1,
> remote-curl uses post_rpc() (and associated functions), but when doing
> the same for protocol v2, it uses a separate set of functions
> (proxy_rpc() and others). Besides
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:18 AM Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:25 PM Jonathan Tan wrote:
> > + for i in $(test_seq 1 1500)
> > + do
> > + # do not use here-doc, because it requires a process
> > + # per loop iteration
> > + e
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:25 PM Jonathan Tan wrote:
> diff --git a/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh b/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh
> @@ -542,7 +542,38 @@ test_expect_success 'clone with http:// using protocol
> v2' '
> +test_expect_success 'clone big repository with http:// using protocol v2' '
> + test_wh
When transmitting and receiving POSTs for protocol v0 and v1,
remote-curl uses post_rpc() (and associated functions), but when doing
the same for protocol v2, it uses a separate set of functions
(proxy_rpc() and others). Besides duplication of code, this has caused
at least one bug: the auth retry
4 matches
Mail list logo