On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 11:54:05AM -0400, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > Prior to this commit, we show both entries with
> > identical reflog messages. After this commit, we show
> > only the "comes back" entry. See the update in t3200
> > which
Jeff King writes:
> Prior to this commit, we show both entries with
> identical reflog messages. After this commit, we show
> only the "comes back" entry. See the update in t3200
> which demonstrates this.
>
> Arguably either is fine, as the whole
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:14:07AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> @@ -3132,7 +3132,10 @@ static struct commit *get_revision_1(struct rev_info
> *revs)
> if (revs->max_age != -1 &&
> (commit->date < revs->max_age))
>
The reflog-walk system works by putting a ref's tip into the
pending queue, and then "traversing" the reflog by
pretending that the parent of each commit is the previous
reflog entry.
This causes a number of user-visible oddities, as documented
in t1414 (and the commit message which introduced
4 matches
Mail list logo