On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Trần Ngọc Quân wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 12:57, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>> I suggest use C preprocessor instead. The person who complete git (make
>>> debian, rpm etc. package) decide enable it or not (disable by default).
>>> Most of people use git from distribution ins
On 02/12/2013 14:40, Trần Ngọc Quân wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 12:57, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>> I suggest use C preprocessor instead. The person who complete git (make
>>> debian, rpm etc. package) decide enable it or not (disable by default).
>>> Most of people use git from distribution instead of comp
On 02/12/2013 12:57, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> I suggest use C preprocessor instead. The person who complete git (make
>> debian, rpm etc. package) decide enable it or not (disable by default).
>> Most of people use git from distribution instead of complete it from source.
>>
>> #ifndef VSNPRINTF_OK
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Trần Ngọc Quân wrote:
>> --- a/gettext.c
>> +++ b/gettext.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ int use_gettext_poison(void)
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifndef NO_GETTEXT
>> +static int test_vsnprintf(const char *fmt, ...)
>> +{
>> + char buf[26];
>> + int ret;
>> + va_list ap
On 01/12/2013 09:45, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> Bug 6530 [1] in glibc causes "git show v0.99.6~1" to fail with error
> "your vsnprintf is broken". The workaround avoids that, but it
> corrupts system error messages in non-C locales.
>
> The bug has been fixed since 2.17. We could know running gl
Bug 6530 [1] in glibc causes "git show v0.99.6~1" to fail with error
"your vsnprintf is broken". The workaround avoids that, but it
corrupts system error messages in non-C locales.
The bug has been fixed since 2.17. We could know running glibc version
with gnu_get_libc_version(). But version is no
6 matches
Mail list logo
