> These all look OK (I am not sure about message i18n, though).
>
> Do we not test a case where --force-with-lease push is rejected due
> to REF_STATUS_REJECT_STALE?
Good idea, new patch on the way.
-andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a messag
Andrew Wheeler writes:
> diff --git a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
> index c402d8d..c65033f 100755
> --- a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
> +++ b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
> @@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ test_expect_success 'push to update (allowed, tracking)' '
> (
> cd dst &&
>
From: Andrew Wheeler
The --force--with-lease push option leads to less
detailed status information than --force. In particular,
the output indicates that a reference was fast-forwarded,
even when it was force-updated.
Modify the --force-with-lease ref status logic to leverage
the --force ref sta
3 matches
Mail list logo