Christian Couder writes:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Matthieu Moy
> wrote:
>> Christian Couder writes:
>>
>>> That's why instead of ignoring only the first line, it is better to
>>> ignore the first
Christian Couder writes:
> We currently ignore the first line passed to `git interpret-trailers`,
> when looking for the beginning of the trailers.
>
> Unfortunately this does not work well when a commit is created with a
> line break in the title, using for example
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christian Couder writes:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Matthieu Moy
>> wrote:
>>> Christian Couder writes:
>>>
That's
Christian Couder writes:
> That's why instead of ignoring only the first line, it is better to
> ignore the first paragraph.
> ---
Lacks sign-off again.
This replaces PATCH 2/2 in your previous series, but requires PATCH 1/2,
right? If so that would be simpler to
Christian Couder writes:
> This first patch is already in master. That's why I only sent the
> second one. But yeah I could have explained that after the three
> dashes.
OK, my bad, I should have "git fetch"ed.
Thanks,
--
Matthieu Moy
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Matthieu Moy
wrote:
> Christian Couder writes:
>
>> That's why instead of ignoring only the first line, it is better to
>> ignore the first paragraph.
>> ---
>
> Lacks sign-off again.
Ooops, sorry.
>
We currently ignore the first line passed to `git interpret-trailers`,
when looking for the beginning of the trailers.
Unfortunately this does not work well when a commit is created with a
line break in the title, using for example the following command:
git commit -m 'place of
code: change we
7 matches
Mail list logo