"brian m. carlson" writes:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:15:34AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> With a hope that this might help other reviewers, here is the
>> interdiff between "the previous one merged with v2.15-rc1" and "this
>> round applied on v2.15-rc1
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:49:13PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:15:34AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > With a hope that this might help other reviewers, here is the
> > interdiff between "the previous one merged with v2.15-rc1" and "this
> > round applied on
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:15:34AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> With a hope that this might help other reviewers, here is the
> interdiff between "the previous one merged with v2.15-rc1" and "this
> round applied on v2.15-rc1 directly".
>
> The changes all looked sensible to me. Thanks.
Is
"brian m. carlson" writes:
> This is the tenth in a series of patches to convert from unsigned char
> [20] to struct object_id. This series mostly involves changes to the
> refs code. After these changes, there are almost no references to
> unsigned char in the
This is the tenth in a series of patches to convert from unsigned char
[20] to struct object_id. This series mostly involves changes to the
refs code. After these changes, there are almost no references to
unsigned char in the main refs code.
In this iteration, I chose to skip the ALLOC_ARRAY
5 matches
Mail list logo